OLPC: Not just for developing countries

5 03 2007

While laptops fall outside of my personal definition of “mobile learning,” due to their size, the One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) project does help to inform much of the strategy and pedagogy of mobile learning and is therefore noteworthy here.

The project was originally aimed at putting cheap but highly practical laptops in the hands of the world’s most underprivileged children in developing countries. While the laptops are cheap to manufacture at around US$150 each (a price expected to fall by almost half in the next three years), they provide a full computing platform that supports the latest in social, constructivist, and connected learning theories and activities, including ad-hoc wireless networking, webcam, microphone, SD memory card slot and built-in speakers.

A prototype children's laptop, One Laptop Per Child (OLPC), is showcased at the 2007 International Consumer Electronics Showin Las Vegas.

With such great functionality at such a low manufacturing price, there have been thousands of people in developed countries interested in buying an OLPC for their own private use. However, the OLPC has maintained strict adherance to its core mission, and combines design features to prevent the devices from being used by anyone other than children, for any purpose other than education; to prevent them making their way to the black market, for example, the devices can be remotely disabled to render them useless.

While Australia ranks among the world’s developed countries, there is no doubt, however, that some of our regionally located indigenous populations live in conditions of poverty equal to those in third-world countries overseas. Happily, out first-world status as a country will not deny our neediest children access to these machines, and according to The Age, Rangan Srikhanta, a treasurer with the United Nations Association of Australia, is liasing with local governments, universities and the OLPC group to organise local trials:

He asserts that there are many children in “developed” countries, such as Australia, that are exposed to conditions typical of those expected in developing countries.

“We are working to get this laptop to the Northern Territory, where we feel that it could be very beneficial,” he said.

“There are numerous other areas in Queensland, WA, SA, NSW, Vic and Tas that hold equal potential.”

This is an excellent outcome.  Let’s hope that mobile computing continues to support opportunities for education for the world’s most needy children, everywhere.

technorati tags:, , , , , , , , , , ,

Advertisements

Actions

Information

5 responses

5 03 2007
OLPC: Not just for developing countries | Pilka

[…] read full story […]

6 03 2007
Stephen Downes

I wonder whether it would not be more appropriate to reconsider your ‘size’ parameter in your definition of mobile learning.

Certainly, being able to move about with a wireless-enabled laptop slung over my shoulder has made me much more of a mobile learner than I was with only my desktop (and I might add that I had no real use for a laptop before wireless came along).

And the OLPC machines are even smaller, even more portable, and can even be run without being tied down by a power cord.

How, I wonder, is a mobile phone or a PDA more mobile than these computers?

I have always defined ‘mobile computing’ to include whatever you could carry about reasonably conveniently. The OLPCs certainly qualify.

6 03 2007
Mobile Learning » Blog Archive » Does Mobile Technology equate with Mobile Learning?

[…] Mobile Learning An Online Reflective Journal on Mobile Learning Practice « OLPC: Not just for developing countries […]

6 03 2007
wayan

Good luck getting the OLPC in Australia. While it was designed in America, right or wrong, the Children’s Machine XO will not be in USA Schools.

10 03 2007
Sudablog

[…] On Stephen’s website: http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=39283The answer suggested by this article is “yes” and I am inclined to agree. As George Siemens notes, the first paragraph tells the story. “What if every child in the world could have a free personal laptop? Put some e-books on it, make it Web-capable, and add a palette of media tools so children could work on creative projects. Wouldn’t that be incredible?” Yes it would. But there’s a lot more to this story. Like, for example, how the development work proceeded. “These academicians have ideas and they aren’t afraid to use them. One is that we learn by creating. Another is that education is a community-based effort and hierarchical institutions get in the way.” Makes me realize that my own research organization has procedures in place to make sure something like this never happens. And like, for example, how it can be used. “Imagine a room filled with students capable of passing digital notes to each other at every point during a lesson.” Leonard Low also comments on the OLPC project, saying they are too large to be considered mobile technology – a proposition with which I disagree. Laurie Rowell, eLearn Magazine, March 5, 2007.  […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




%d bloggers like this: